LPG Gas Cylinder Expiry Date

Have U ever heard about LPG gas cylinder’s expiry date….!!

Expired Cylinders are not safe for use and may cause accidents. In this regard please be cautious at the time of accepting any LPG cylinder from the Vendor.

Here is how we can check the expiry of LPG cylinders:
On one of three side stems of the cylinder, the expiry date is coded alpha numerically as follows A or B or C or D and some two digit number following this e.g. D06.

The alphabets stand for quarters:

·        A for March (First Qtr)

·        B for June (Second Qtr)

·        C for Sept (Third Qtr)

·        D for December (Fourth Qtr).

The digits stand for the year till it is valid. Hence D06 would mean December qtr of 2006.
Please Return Back the Cylinder that you get with a Expiry Date, they are prone to Leak and other Hazardous accidents

The second example with D13 allows the cylinder to be in use until Dec 2013.

TERKINI! PERMATANG PAUH, 25 Ogos (Hrkh)

Imam Masjid Wilayah Persekutuan, Ramlang Porigi memohon maaf kepada seluruh rakyat Malaysia kerana kehadirannya secara tidak sengaja dalam majlis sumpah Saiful Bukhari Azlan 15 Ogos lepas menimbulkan banyak fitnah.

Katanya, beliau langsung tidak terbabit dengan pengaturan sumpah tersebut, sebaliknya diajak menghadiri suatu majlis yang telah diaturkan pihak tertentu secara tidak dirancang.

Beliau yang dijemput memberikan penerangan sempena Solat Hajat Perdana bersama Menteri Besar Kelantan, Dato’ Nik Aziz Nik Mat di Masjid Bandar Perda malam tadi mendedahkan, kehadiran beliau di situ secara kebetulan menikahkan orang bukanya mengatur program jahat tersebut.

“Saya bukan Imam besar di situ saya cuma imam biasa sahaja. Imam besarnya ialah Haji Abdul Malek Saleh. Di televisyen mengatakan saya Iman Besar di situ salah sama sekali kerana kehadiran saya di situ untuk menikahkan pasangan pengantin.

Bila sudah upacara angat nikah tiba-tiba saya diajak ke program sumpah Saiful untuk menjadi saksi mendengar jika sekiranya tersilap perkataan terutamanya kalimah bahasa Arab, ” ujarnya di hadapan ribuan jemaah.

Menurutnya, pada pukul 6.05 petang semasa menunggu tiba-tiba Saiful datang dengan beberapa orang dan terus membaca sumpah laknatnya.

Semasa membaca lafaz sumpah itu beliau beberapa kali tersalah lafazkanya termasuk tarikh kejadian.

Beliau juga hairan kenapa tiba-tiba sahaja Saiful bersumpah sedangkan lafaz sumpah sepatutnya diadakah oleh kedua-dua pihak terutamanya orang yang kena tuduh bukan yang menuduh.

“Sepatutnya sebarang program yang bakal di adakan di masjid ini mesti mendapat kebenaran dulu daripada saya atau pegawai masjid yang lain, Bukan boleh buat program sewenang-wenangnya, ” katanya.

Jelas beliau lagi, jika difikirkan dengan keadaan umur dan fizikal Anwar mustahil beliau boleh lakukan perbuatan terkutuk itu kerana ia memerlukan kekuatan tambahan kejadian itu berlaku bukan suka sama suka.

Beliau juga memohon maaf kepada semua rakyat Malaysia kerana hadir dalam program berkenaan dan berharap pengakuannya malam ini mengakhiri tangapan buruk terhadapnya sepertimana yang tersiar dalam media dan internet.

Beliau juga berpendapat bahawa sumpah laknat yang dilafazkan oleh Saiful Bukhari Azlan merupakan sumpah laknat untuk dirinya sendiri, bukan untuk Anwar Ibrahim.

Solat hajat perdana itu diimamkan oleh Tuan Guru Haji Saleh dari Sik, Kedah manakala hadir memberikan ucapan ringkas ialah bekas Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan, Dato Mohd HashimYahya, Ketua Dewan Ulama PAS Pusat, Ustaz Mohd Daud Iraqi, Timbalan Ketua MenteriPulau Pinang, Mohamad Fairus Khairudin dan Menteri Besar Kelantan, Tuan Guru Dato’ Nik Aziz Nik Mat.

Sued over email with sexy pictures, offensive content

By M. MAGESWARI

KUALA LUMPUR: A consultant is suing a public listed company, its subsidiary and three of its workers for RM30mil over alleged defamation, sexual harassment and abuse of power.

Datuk Baharruddin Hamzah, 33, has named Petroliam Nasional Bhd, Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd (PC),PC engineer Mohd Arshad Ahmad Nawawi, 37, PC receiving officer Alinah Ahmad Shah, 41, PC officer Nasrum Mohamad, 29, as defendants in his civil suit.

He filed the suit at the High Court (civil) registry under the law firm of Shaari Nor & Co with the presence of his lawyers at about 3pm on Tuesday.

He had also stated his company, Abyssina Builders (M) Sdn Bhd, a contractor involved in the oil and gas industry, as another plaintiff.

In the statement of claim, he said that Mohd Arshad had sent two e-mail messages containing an article and three photographs of half-naked women to his wife, who is his company’s chief executive officer, using Petroliam Nasional Bhd’s domain on July 29, last year.

He said Mohd Arshad had sent another e-mail on the same date that contained “offensive wordings.”

He claimed that he came to know about the circulation of such indecent material and article on the same date when he was holidaying in Malacca with his children.

He further claimed that he was shocked and that the act had resulted him having a fight with his wife who later left their matrimonial home and divorced him on Sept 11 last year.

The divorce had resulted in his 12-year-old daughter coming under the custody of his wife, while he retained custody of his two sons aged seven and 11.

He claimed that such e-mail had caused his children to suffer emotional disturbance, loss of love, depression, the companionship of his parents and had affected their education.

He claimed that he suffered public scandal, loss of reputation, ridicule, odium and contempt.

Among others, Baharruddin said Alinah had purposely sent an e-mail on Aug 1 last year to his wife containing four indecent photographs.

The plaintiffs said his company continued to receive such e-mail for several days from June 11 this year.

He said the actions of the Mohd Arshad and Alinah showed abuse of power given by PC to send such e-mail using the official e-mail domain of Petroliam Nasional Bhd.

He said a police report on the name of his company over the matter had been lodged at Bukit Aman on Aug 8.

Speaking to reporters, Baharruddin said he decided to file the suit as “it is a question over ethics”.

“It is a cheap e-mail being circulated around by the company’s staff. My children had seen the photographs and it is really embarrassing.

“I decided to put a stop to this. It is also a sort of punishment,” he said after his two sons held posters condemning the act of sending such e-mail after the filing of the suit at the court premises here.

He is seeking to get RM10mil each for alleged abuse of power, defamation and sexual harassment.

He is also seeking for a declaration that the public listed company and its subsidiary was responsible for their staff’s actions and others costs deemed fit by the court.